The Greatest Post Ever

i read two things online: something old and something new-- sort of like a digital version of the meaningless supplies at a wedding. half of them, anyway. although, technically, because i plugged them here they also count as "something borrowed."

and my links are blue.

anyway, what was said in a combination of both articles is that-- for one-- blogging frequently may be unnecessary and result in less intelligent writings. it’s sort of like the slow food movement. i suppose that was an unknowing stab at the intoxicated poop segments, although perhaps i don't take myself seriously enough anyway. either way, the slow-blogging theory is angled at blogs that get a minimum of 100-200 visitors a day-- which means i'm just barely included and should pay attention if i want to grow.

the other important fact mentioned was that most entertaining blogs succeed when they keep their posts short. wordier articles are meant for reference blogs alone and require professionals and scientists.


but, they say, "if you're aiming for a more leisurely (and entertaining) read… popular blogs have an average of 100-250 words per article." which was a bit insulting at first because i’ve always believed a good post requires some rambling. anyway, in order to increase my visitor count, i didn’t post for two days. and today, i plan to follow the graphs presented in the theoretical articles of ideal post-length. this post will be kept under 250 words and i promise to give you all, at the very